1. Abbara S. et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guideli-nes Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3(3):190-204
2. Blanke P, et al. Computed tomography imaging in the context of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) / transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. JCCT 2019; 13 (1): 1–20
3. Nieman K, Gaemperli O, Lancellotti P, Plein S. Advanced Cardiac Imaging, 1st Edi-tion 2015.
4. Zamorano JL, Bax J, Knuuti J, Sechtem U, Lancellotti P, Badano L. The ESC Text-book of Cardiovascular Imaging 2nd ed. Oxford University Press 2016.
5. Leipsic J et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guideli-nes Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8(5):342-58.
6. Hecht H, et al. Clinical indications for coronary artery calcium scoring in asymptoma-tic patients: Expert consensus statement from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. JCCT 2017; 11(2): 157–168
7. Cury R, et al. CAD-RADS Coronary Artery Disease: Reporting and Data System. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology. Jo-urnal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 10 (2016) 269-281
8. Han KB, et al. Computed Tomography Imaging in Patients with Congenital Heart Di-sease Part I: Rationale and Utility. An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) Endorsed by the Society of Pediatric Radiology (SPR) and the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging (NASCI). Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 2015;9:475-492.
9. Han KB, et al. Computed Tomography Imaging in Patients with Congenital Heart Di-sease, Part 2: Technical Recommendations. An Expert Consensus Document of the So-ciety of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) Endorsed by the Society of Pe-
diatric Radiology (SPR) and the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging (NASCI). Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 2015;9:493-513.
10. Pelberg, R, Budoff M, Goraya T, Keevil J, Lesser J, Litwin S, et al. Training, compe-tency, and certification in cardiac CT: A summary statement from the Society of Cardio-vascular Computed Tomography. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 2011; 5: 279–285.
11. Budoff M, Achenbach S, et al. Task Force 12: Training in Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging (Computed Tomography). JACC 2006; 47(4):915-920.
12. Nieman K, Achenbach S, et al. Cardiac computed tomography core syllabus of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging 2015;16:351–352
13. Schroeder S, Achenbach S, et al Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applica-tions, limitations, and training requirements. European Heart Journal 2008;29: 531–556
14. Hirshfeld JW, et al. 2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT Expert Consensus Docu-ment on Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging: Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness. JACC 2018; 71 (24) e283-e351.
15. Hecht H, et al. CAC-DRS: Coronary Artery Calcium Data and Reporting System. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT). JCCT 2018; 12 (3):185–191
16. Kalisz K, Buethe J, Saboo SS, Abbara S, Halliburton S, Rajiah P. Artifacts at Cardiac CT: Physics and Solutions. Radiographics. 2016;36(7):2064-2083.
17. Douglas PS, Pontone G, Hlatky MA, et al. Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reser-ve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFRct: outcome and resource impacts study. Eur Heart J, 2015;36:3359-67